<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Monday Evening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Païens ont tort et Chrétiens ont droit.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:33:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Turning back the clock by Marcel</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/turning-back-the-clock/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=2049#comment-813</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather have had the Olympics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather have had the Olympics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turning back the clock by Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/turning-back-the-clock/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=2049#comment-812</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the pork barrel for Illinois, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the pork barrel for Illinois, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hasan&#8217;s nightmare by Foxfier</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/hasans-nightmare/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Foxfier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=2035#comment-811</guid>
		<description>Given the antics the SOB apparently got up to, the &quot;harassment&quot; he was pissed about was probably things like him being counseled for trying to get folks to convert when he was supposed to be doing his job, etc.

He was shot...by a TINY woman.  Even better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the antics the SOB apparently got up to, the &#8220;harassment&#8221; he was pissed about was probably things like him being counseled for trying to get folks to convert when he was supposed to be doing his job, etc.</p>
<p>He was shot&#8230;by a TINY woman.  Even better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And the Russians are right&#8230; by John</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/and-the-russians-are-right/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=1983#comment-806</guid>
		<description>1.  The Russians are right.

2.  The Russians &lt;i&gt;want&lt;/i&gt; Iran to get the bomb.  So why are we trying to use them as leverage?  These are our strategic opponents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  The Russians are right.</p>
<p>2.  The Russians <i>want</i> Iran to get the bomb.  So why are we trying to use them as leverage?  These are our strategic opponents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservatives by foxfier</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/conservatives/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>foxfier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=2000#comment-805</guid>
		<description>An embarrassment of riches!

Thank you greatly. ^.^  Kind of nice to see someone else try to offer a bunch of possible different sources for research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An embarrassment of riches!</p>
<p>Thank you greatly. ^.^  Kind of nice to see someone else try to offer a bunch of possible different sources for research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservatives by Marcel</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/conservatives/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=2000#comment-804</guid>
		<description>The pdf linked in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/02news/div_mar_cohab.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New Report Sheds Light on Trends and Patterns in Marriage, Divorce, and Cohabitation&lt;/a&gt; has a lot of data, but only a little on rural vs. urban people. 

Here&#039;s a table showing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.divorcemag.com/statistics/statsUS2.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;divorce rates by state&lt;/a&gt;. It supports the idea that divorce rates are higher in rural areas, but I don&#039;t know how reliable it is - I couldn&#039;t track down their source. 

Some material from a college class on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://my.ilstu.edu/~jeweinz/soc112/notes/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;American Family: Change and Diversity&lt;/a&gt; looks useful.

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frc.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Family Research Council&lt;/a&gt; looks like it has a lot of material. 

Finally, if you have access at home or from the library, &lt;i&gt;CQ Researcher&lt;/i&gt; seems to have some good, though long, summaries. And, this post does show up in my feedreader (Google reader).

That&#039;s probably a more thorough reply than warranted. Sometimes I get carried away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pdf linked in <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/02news/div_mar_cohab.htm" rel="nofollow">New Report Sheds Light on Trends and Patterns in Marriage, Divorce, and Cohabitation</a> has a lot of data, but only a little on rural vs. urban people. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a table showing <a href="http://www.divorcemag.com/statistics/statsUS2.shtml" rel="nofollow">divorce rates by state</a>. It supports the idea that divorce rates are higher in rural areas, but I don&#8217;t know how reliable it is &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t track down their source. </p>
<p>Some material from a college class on the <a href="http://my.ilstu.edu/~jeweinz/soc112/notes/index.html" rel="nofollow">American Family: Change and Diversity</a> looks useful.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.frc.org/" rel="nofollow">Family Research Council</a> looks like it has a lot of material. </p>
<p>Finally, if you have access at home or from the library, <i>CQ Researcher</i> seems to have some good, though long, summaries. And, this post does show up in my feedreader (Google reader).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s probably a more thorough reply than warranted. Sometimes I get carried away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservatives by foxfier</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/conservatives/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>foxfier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=2000#comment-803</guid>
		<description>Huh... I think the RSS feed is funky, I never got this on my reader!

I would kind of like to see the stats on rural white community&#039;s divorce rates, though-- it doesn&#039;t seem to jive with what I&#039;ve seen, unless urban populations are simply more likely to have children without getting married at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh&#8230; I think the RSS feed is funky, I never got this on my reader!</p>
<p>I would kind of like to see the stats on rural white community&#8217;s divorce rates, though&#8211; it doesn&#8217;t seem to jive with what I&#8217;ve seen, unless urban populations are simply more likely to have children without getting married at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stargate Universe by John</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/stargate-universe/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=1963#comment-801</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still working my way through season 1 of Atlantis and season 9 of SG-1.  I&#039;ll wait until I&#039;m done with those two shows before tackling Universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still working my way through season 1 of Atlantis and season 9 of SG-1.  I&#8217;ll wait until I&#8217;m done with those two shows before tackling Universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stargate Universe by Aurelia</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/stargate-universe/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Aurelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=1963#comment-800</guid>
		<description>And of course their own Jack O&#039;Neill, John Shepard, and even Cameron Mitchell, to an extent. I guess you just can&#039;t have a main character without having an unpleasant past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course their own Jack O&#8217;Neill, John Shepard, and even Cameron Mitchell, to an extent. I guess you just can&#8217;t have a main character without having an unpleasant past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For effort by Marcel</title>
		<link>http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/for-effort/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondayevening.wordpress.com/?p=1957#comment-799</guid>
		<description>The thing is, I don&#039;t dislike Obama. His politics are way more liberal than mine, and he&#039;s an Illinois politician. But he seems like a decent guy trying to make the best of the circumstances in which he finds himself. I wonder if he really thought he would win the nomination, let alone the election. But now he&#039;s in the White house, and his party controls the legislature. His biggest challenge is not people like me who disagree with his policies, or vicious lunatics who disagree with his race. It&#039;s his sycophantic supporters. They&#039;ve re-channeled (some of) their hatred of Bush, into worship of Obama. That&#039;s not going to end well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, I don&#8217;t dislike Obama. His politics are way more liberal than mine, and he&#8217;s an Illinois politician. But he seems like a decent guy trying to make the best of the circumstances in which he finds himself. I wonder if he really thought he would win the nomination, let alone the election. But now he&#8217;s in the White house, and his party controls the legislature. His biggest challenge is not people like me who disagree with his policies, or vicious lunatics who disagree with his race. It&#8217;s his sycophantic supporters. They&#8217;ve re-channeled (some of) their hatred of Bush, into worship of Obama. That&#8217;s not going to end well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
