I don’t agree with everything at the site (do we need this discalimer? At this point I don’t agree with everything here,) but this is a striking thought:
“I’d like to consider a neglected angle. Let’s begin by distinguishing between a personal Antichrist and a literary Antichrist. Every since the Enlightenment, there have been reconstructions of the “real Jesus.” Reimarus, Strauss, and Renan are three earlier examples.” — For many will come in my name
Maybe it’s like putting an adjective in front of “theology” creates an instant heresy.