I may have discovered a new micro-aggression. As a man, my overcoat is heavier than some. It’s also larger than some, and so takes up more space. The hangers in the closet at work are cheap plastic, so I use two, compounding the offense. All that’s needed is a compelling name.
It’s surprising to see so many liberals and media figures accused of sexual misconduct. A few weeks ago the media turned on Antifa; that surprised me too.
“‘It’s every person for himself or herself right now,’ former senator Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) said.”
Good thing the senator didn’t say “every man for himself,” like men did back in the bad old days. Whatever else happens to the Republican Party, at least they haven’t stooped to micro-aggression. Going forward they’ll need to get a handle on those binary-normative verbal structures, and I’m sure they will; but one step at a time.
“In fact it is entirely possible that Scotland would find no EU to join after it had taken the trouble to break the shackles with the UK. Should the British exit be followed by a Grexit, Deutschit, Departugal, Italeave, Czheckout, Oustria and Buh-byelgium the best Scotland can do is join France and revive the Auld Alliance.” — Forget the Lifeboat, It’s the Iceberg that Counts, by Richard Fernandez
Here’s the list of member states of the European Union. Be creative.
- The law of identity: Everything is identical with itself.
- The law of non-contradiction: No thing is both black and not black.
- The law of the excluded middle: Every thing is either black or not black.
When one of these foundational principles of logic is pointed out to those people in a context in which they must respond (ignoring it being their preferred option), they respond with blather, denial, or force — of one kind or another and in combination. Maybe the blather takes the form of endless demands for dialogue; the denial might involve two activists making contradictory assertions while claiming to agree with each other; the force starts with name-calling and escalates to whatever it takes.
I’m not sure who those people are exactly. Maybe liberals, or progressives, or leftists; maybe elites, or politicians, or The Man; maybe simply anyone who begins by thinking “What should I say to get what I want?” Maybe it’s almost everyone at one time or another. Errors are easier to see in other people than in ourselves, and we’d rather not draw attention to the logical failures and sophistry of someone who is “on our side.” Anyway, it’s probably a mistake to put all human discourse into one of three categories.
What’s black, and white, and red all over?