Unfortunately, some, like one of the commenters on the linked post, conclude that this case shows there’s something wrong with logic. There’s nothing wrong with logic, but logic requires assumptions to work on: given the bullet holes in the sample aircraft show where the planes are being hit, then it is logical to think armouring those areas might help. But the sample is exactly backwards, as the mathematician pointed out.The correct starting assumption would be what the mathematician pointed out.
Right after the hideous dogma that logic, like everything else, is a social construct, the failure to grasp the necessity of assumption – what boils down to the necessity of the correct epistemology – is the way modern people who imagine themselves reasonable most often fail.

]]>